jungle
This will vary because unlike other stat sites we include 100% of a brackets champions played and never include champions that don't belong in the bracket.
Unranked Champions Analysed: 424,654
We include 100% of the champions played of every selected tier bracket in our analysis, we never include champions from outside the tier quoted tier.
Xin Zhao Counters
Xin Zhao jungle vs jungle Counters
Xin Zhao jungle on Patch 15.17 is the strongest counter to jungle champions of Lee Sin, Sylas & Nocturne. While Xin Zhao jungle is countered most by jungle champions of Warwick, Kayn & Shaco. Below is a detailed breakdown of Xin Zhao jungle counters against jungle champions with a minimum of 100 games.
Warwick
la furia scatenata di Zaun
Xin Zhao wins against Warwick 40.14% of the time which is 15.94% lower against Warwick than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Xin Zhao wins against Warwick 15.48% less often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Warwick is 56.08%.
Kayn
il mietitore d'ombra
Xin Zhao wins against Kayn 43.50% of the time which is 8.14% lower against Kayn than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Xin Zhao wins against Kayn 7.68% less often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Kayn is 51.64%.
Shaco
il demone giullare
Xin Zhao wins against Shaco 43.69% of the time which is 8.43% lower against Shaco than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Xin Zhao wins against Shaco 7.97% less often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Shaco is 52.12%.
Master Yi
lo spadaccino Wuju
Xin Zhao wins against Master Yi 44.38% of the time which is 8.62% lower against Master Yi than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Xin Zhao wins against Master Yi 8.16% less often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Master Yi is 53.00%.
Trundle
il re dei troll
Xin Zhao wins against Trundle 46.08% of the time which is 3.06% lower against Trundle than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Xin Zhao wins against Trundle 2.60% less often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Trundle is 49.14%.
Volibear
la Tempesta implacabile
Xin Zhao wins against Volibear 48.53% of the time which is 1.62% higher against Volibear than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Xin Zhao wins against Volibear 2.08% more often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Volibear is 46.91%.
Briar
la fame repressa
Xin Zhao wins against Briar 48.74% of the time which is 0.29% lower against Briar than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Xin Zhao wins against Briar 0.17% more often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Briar is 49.03%.
Viego
Il Re in rovina
Xin Zhao wins against Viego 49.33% of the time which is 2.89% higher against Viego than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Xin Zhao wins against Viego 3.35% more often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Viego is 46.44%.
Nocturne
l'eterno incubo
Xin Zhao wins against Nocturne 50.00% of the time which is 1.00% lower against Nocturne than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Xin Zhao wins against Nocturne 0.54% less often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Nocturne is 51.00%.
Sylas
il rivoluzionario scatenato
Xin Zhao wins against Sylas 50.79% of the time which is 5.86% higher against Sylas than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Xin Zhao wins against Sylas 6.32% more often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Sylas is 44.93%.
Lee Sin
il monaco cieco
Xin Zhao wins against Lee Sin 51.61% of the time which is 1.72% higher against Lee Sin than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Xin Zhao wins against Lee Sin 2.18% more often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Lee Sin is 49.89%.
