![披甲龙龟](https://cdn5.lolalytics.com/champx46/rammus.webp)
![emerald_plus](https://cdn5.lolalytics.com/emblem40/emerald.webp)
EMERALD+
30
Days
vs
Average Emerald+ Win Rate: 51.89%
Emerald+ Champions Analysed: 51,734,723
?
Different tier brackets will have different average win rates so we now provide the average.
This will vary because unlike other stat sites we include 100% of a brackets champions played and never include champions that don't belong in the bracket.
This will vary because unlike other stat sites we include 100% of a brackets champions played and never include champions that don't belong in the bracket.
Emerald+ Champions Analysed: 51,734,723
?
We are the only League of Legends stats site to analyse every champion from every ranked game.
We include 100% of the champions played of every selected tier bracket in our analysis, we never include champions from outside the tier quoted tier.
We include 100% of the champions played of every selected tier bracket in our analysis, we never include champions from outside the tier quoted tier.
![披甲龙龟](https://cdn5.lolalytics.com/champ140/rammus.webp)
![middle lane](https://cdn5.lolalytics.com/lane27/middle.webp)
披甲龙龟 Counters
披甲龙龟 middle vs middle Counters
Presently there is insufficent games played by 披甲龙龟 middle on Patch 30 to determine the strongest middle counters. A matchup requires a minimum of 100 games to be displayed.
Name
WR vs
All Champs WR
Δ1
Δ2
Games
![披甲龙龟](https://cdn5.lolalytics.com/champx46/rammus.webp)
vs
![疾风剑豪](https://cdn5.lolalytics.com/champx46/yasuo.webp)
疾风剑豪
亚索
披甲龙龟 wins against 疾风剑豪 56.12% of the time which is 7.23% higher against 疾风剑豪 than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates 披甲龙龟 wins against 疾风剑豪 5.39% more often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against 疾风剑豪is 48.89%.