![万花通灵](https://cdn5.lolalytics.com/champx46/neeko.webp)
![emerald_plus](https://cdn5.lolalytics.com/emblem40/emerald.webp)
EMERALD+
30
Days
vs
Average Emerald+ Win Rate: 51.91%
Emerald+ Champions Analysed: 40,048,908
?
Different tier brackets will have different average win rates so we now provide the average.
This will vary because unlike other stat sites we include 100% of a brackets champions played and never include champions that don't belong in the bracket.
This will vary because unlike other stat sites we include 100% of a brackets champions played and never include champions that don't belong in the bracket.
Emerald+ Champions Analysed: 40,048,908
?
We are the only League of Legends stats site to analyse every champion from every ranked game.
We include 100% of the champions played of every selected tier bracket in our analysis, we never include champions from outside the tier quoted tier.
We include 100% of the champions played of every selected tier bracket in our analysis, we never include champions from outside the tier quoted tier.
![万花通灵](https://cdn5.lolalytics.com/champ140/neeko.webp)
![bottom lane](https://cdn5.lolalytics.com/lane27/bottom.webp)
万花通灵 Counters
万花通灵 bottom vs bottom Counters
Presently there is insufficent games played by 万花通灵 bottom on Patch 30 to determine the strongest bottom counters. A matchup requires a minimum of 100 games to be displayed.
Name
WR vs
All Champs WR
Δ1
Δ2
Games
![万花通灵](https://cdn5.lolalytics.com/champx46/neeko.webp)
vs
![探险家](https://cdn5.lolalytics.com/champx46/ezreal.webp)
探险家
伊泽瑞尔
万花通灵 wins against 探险家 46.72% of the time which is 2.54% lower against 探险家 than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates 万花通灵 wins against 探险家 5.79% less often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against 探险家 is 49.26%.