![远古恐惧](https://cdn5.lolalytics.com/champx46/fiddlesticks.webp)
![emerald_plus](https://cdn5.lolalytics.com/emblem40/emerald.webp)
EMERALD+
Patch
14.12
vs
Average Emerald+ Win Rate: 51.62%
Emerald+ Champions Analysed: 7,199,996
?
Different tier brackets will have different average win rates so we now provide the average.
This will vary because unlike other stat sites we include 100% of a brackets champions played and never include champions that don't belong in the bracket.
This will vary because unlike other stat sites we include 100% of a brackets champions played and never include champions that don't belong in the bracket.
Emerald+ Champions Analysed: 7,199,996
?
We are the only League of Legends stats site to analyse every champion from every ranked game.
We include 100% of the champions played of every selected tier bracket in our analysis, we never include champions from outside the tier quoted tier.
We include 100% of the champions played of every selected tier bracket in our analysis, we never include champions from outside the tier quoted tier.
![远古恐惧](https://cdn5.lolalytics.com/champ140/fiddlesticks.webp)
![middle lane](https://cdn5.lolalytics.com/lane27/middle.webp)
远古恐惧 Counters
远古恐惧 middle vs bottom Counters
Presently there is insufficent games played by 远古恐惧 middle on Patch 14.12 to determine the strongest bottom counters. A matchup requires a minimum of 100 games to be displayed.
Name
WR vs
All Champs WR
Δ1
Δ2
Games
![远古恐惧](https://cdn5.lolalytics.com/champx46/fiddlesticks.webp)
vs
![虚空之女](https://cdn5.lolalytics.com/champx46/kaisa.webp)
虚空之女
卡莎
远古恐惧 wins against 虚空之女 50.36% of the time which is 2.58% higher against 虚空之女 than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates 远古恐惧 wins against 虚空之女 3.10% less often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against 虚空之女is 47.78%.