bottom
This will vary because unlike other stat sites we include 100% of a brackets champions played and never include champions that don't belong in the bracket.
Emerald+ Champions Analysed: 13,326,574
We include 100% of the champions played of every selected tier bracket in our analysis, we never include champions from outside the tier quoted tier.
Cassiopeia Counters
Cassiopeia bottom vs bottom Counters
Cassiopeia bottom on Patch 14 is the strongest counter to bottom champions of Yunara, Ezreal & Varus. While Cassiopeia bottom is countered most by bottom champions of Smolder, Caitlyn & Jhin. Below is a detailed breakdown of Cassiopeia bottom counters against bottom champions with a minimum of 100 games.
Smolder
Tiểu Hỏa Long
Cassiopeia wins against Smolder 46.09% of the time which is 3.07% lower against Smolder than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Cassiopeia wins against Smolder 5.10% less often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Smolder is 49.16%.
Caitlyn
Cảnh Sát Trưởng Piltover
Cassiopeia wins against Caitlyn 46.67% of the time which is 4.42% lower against Caitlyn than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Cassiopeia wins against Caitlyn 6.45% less often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Caitlyn is 51.09%.
Jhin
Nghệ Sĩ Tử Thần
Cassiopeia wins against Jhin 48.57% of the time which is 2.21% lower against Jhin than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Cassiopeia wins against Jhin 4.24% less often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Jhin is 50.78%.
Sivir
Nữ Chúa Chiến Trường
Cassiopeia wins against Sivir 49.23% of the time which is 0.87% higher against Sivir than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Cassiopeia wins against Sivir 1.16% less often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Sivir is 48.36%.
Jinx
Khẩu Pháo Nổi Loạn
Cassiopeia wins against Jinx 50.91% of the time which is 2.00% higher against Jinx than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Cassiopeia wins against Jinx 0.03% less often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Jinx is 48.91%.
Lucian
Kẻ Thanh Trừng
Cassiopeia wins against Lucian 51.85% of the time which is 2.07% higher against Lucian than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Cassiopeia wins against Lucian 0.04% more often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Lucian is 49.78%.
Kai'Sa
Ái Nữ Hư Không
Cassiopeia wins against Kai'Sa 52.35% of the time which is 2.24% higher against Kai'Sa than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Cassiopeia wins against Kai'Sa 0.21% more often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Kai'Sa is 50.11%.
Aphelios
Song Nguyệt Chiến Binh
Cassiopeia wins against Aphelios 52.56% of the time which is 1.75% higher against Aphelios than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Cassiopeia wins against Aphelios 0.28% less often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Aphelios is 50.81%.
Varus
Mũi Tên Báo Thù
Cassiopeia wins against Varus 53.00% of the time which is 1.22% higher against Varus than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Cassiopeia wins against Varus 0.80% less often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Varus is 51.78%.
Ezreal
Nhà Thám Hiểm
Cassiopeia wins against Ezreal 55.49% of the time which is 2.58% higher against Ezreal than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Cassiopeia wins against Ezreal 0.56% more often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Ezreal is 52.91%.
Yunara
Bất Phá Tín Niệm
Cassiopeia wins against Yunara 57.52% of the time which is 6.27% higher against Yunara than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Cassiopeia wins against Yunara 4.24% more often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Yunara is 51.25%.
