top
This will vary because unlike other stat sites we include 100% of a brackets champions played and never include champions that don't belong in the bracket.
Diamond Champions Analysed: 1,987,309
We include 100% of the champions played of every selected tier bracket in our analysis, we never include champions from outside the tier quoted tier.
Ambessa Counters
Ambessa top vs support Counters
Ambessa top on Patch 15.17 is the strongest counter to support champions of Mel, Shaco & Xerath. While Ambessa top is countered most by support champions of Poppy, Sona & Nautilus. Below is a detailed breakdown of Ambessa top counters against support champions with a minimum of 100 games.
Poppy
Người Giữ Búa
Ambessa wins against Poppy 42.20% of the time which is 4.57% lower against Poppy than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Ambessa wins against Poppy 5.97% less often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Poppy is 46.77%.
Sona
Đại Cầm Nữ
Ambessa wins against Sona 45.05% of the time which is 2.83% lower against Sona than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Ambessa wins against Sona 4.23% less often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Sona is 47.88%.
Nautilus
Khổng Lồ Biển Sâu
Ambessa wins against Nautilus 46.96% of the time which is 3.17% lower against Nautilus than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Ambessa wins against Nautilus 4.57% less often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Nautilus is 50.13%.
Pyke
Sát Thủ Vùng Nước Đỏ
Ambessa wins against Pyke 47.12% of the time which is 2.12% lower against Pyke than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Ambessa wins against Pyke 3.52% less often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Pyke is 49.24%.
Milio
Ngọn Lửa Dịu Êm
Ambessa wins against Milio 47.12% of the time which is 0.88% lower against Milio than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Ambessa wins against Milio 2.28% less often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Milio is 48.00%.
Vel'Koz
Con Mắt Hư Không
Ambessa wins against Vel'Koz 47.40% of the time which is 0.15% lower against Vel'Koz than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Ambessa wins against Vel'Koz 1.55% less often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Vel'Koz is 47.55%.
Thresh
Cai Ngục Xiềng Xích
Ambessa wins against Thresh 48.31% of the time which is 0.81% higher against Thresh than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Ambessa wins against Thresh 0.59% less often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Thresh is 47.50%.
Morgana
Thiên Thần Sa Ngã
Ambessa wins against Morgana 48.31% of the time which is 0.23% lower against Morgana than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Ambessa wins against Morgana 1.63% less often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Morgana is 48.54%.
Karma
Kẻ Được Khai Sáng
Ambessa wins against Karma 48.78% of the time which is 0.22% lower against Karma than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Ambessa wins against Karma 1.62% less often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Karma is 49.00%.
Alistar
Quái Vật Đầu Bò
Ambessa wins against Alistar 49.38% of the time which is 0.13% higher against Alistar than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Ambessa wins against Alistar 1.27% less often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Alistar is 49.25%.
Rakan
Anh Chàng Quyến Rũ
Ambessa wins against Rakan 49.73% of the time which is 1.07% higher against Rakan than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Ambessa wins against Rakan 0.33% less often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Rakan is 48.66%.
Zilean
Giám Hộ Thời Gian
Ambessa wins against Zilean 50.00% of the time which is 1.19% higher against Zilean than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Ambessa wins against Zilean 0.21% less often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Zilean is 48.81%.
Leona
Bình Minh Rực Rỡ
Ambessa wins against Leona 50.00% of the time which is 1.20% higher against Leona than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Ambessa wins against Leona 0.20% less often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Leona is 48.80%.
Maokai
Ma Cây
Ambessa wins against Maokai 50.00% of the time which is 2.16% higher against Maokai than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Ambessa wins against Maokai 0.76% more often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Maokai is 47.84%.
Braum
Trái Tim của Freljord
Ambessa wins against Braum 50.37% of the time which is 1.82% higher against Braum than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Ambessa wins against Braum 0.42% more often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Braum is 48.55%.
Nami
Nàng Tiên Cá
Ambessa wins against Nami 50.42% of the time which is 2.16% higher against Nami than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Ambessa wins against Nami 0.76% more often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Nami is 48.26%.
Seraphine
Ca Sĩ Mộng Mơ
Ambessa wins against Seraphine 50.98% of the time which is 0.27% lower against Seraphine than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Ambessa wins against Seraphine 1.67% less often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Seraphine is 51.25%.
Soraka
Tinh Nữ
Ambessa wins against Soraka 51.58% of the time which is 4.05% higher against Soraka than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Ambessa wins against Soraka 2.65% more often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Soraka is 47.53%.
Bard
Ông Bụt Vũ Trụ
Ambessa wins against Bard 51.59% of the time which is 3.10% higher against Bard than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Ambessa wins against Bard 1.70% more often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Bard is 48.49%.
Lulu
Pháp Sư Tinh Linh
Ambessa wins against Lulu 51.79% of the time which is 1.28% higher against Lulu than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Ambessa wins against Lulu 0.12% less often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Lulu is 50.51%.
Yuumi
Cô Mèo Ma Thuật
Ambessa wins against Yuumi 52.11% of the time which is 0.94% higher against Yuumi than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Ambessa wins against Yuumi 0.46% less often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Yuumi is 51.17%.
Rell
Nữ Kỵ Sĩ Thép
Ambessa wins against Rell 52.66% of the time which is 2.89% higher against Rell than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Ambessa wins against Rell 1.49% more often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Rell is 49.77%.
Blitzcrank
Người Máy Hơi Nước
Ambessa wins against Blitzcrank 53.07% of the time which is 4.08% higher against Blitzcrank than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Ambessa wins against Blitzcrank 2.68% more often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Blitzcrank is 48.99%.
Pantheon
Mũi Giáo Bất Diệt
Ambessa wins against Pantheon 53.52% of the time which is 2.46% higher against Pantheon than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Ambessa wins against Pantheon 1.06% more often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Pantheon is 51.06%.
Janna
Cơn Thịnh Nộ Của Bão Tố
Ambessa wins against Janna 53.85% of the time which is 7.03% higher against Janna than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Ambessa wins against Janna 5.63% more often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Janna is 46.82%.
Zyra
Gai Nổi Loạn
Ambessa wins against Zyra 53.94% of the time which is 5.19% higher against Zyra than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Ambessa wins against Zyra 3.79% more often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Zyra is 48.75%.
Lux
Tiểu Thư Ánh Sáng
Ambessa wins against Lux 54.59% of the time which is 4.73% higher against Lux than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Ambessa wins against Lux 3.33% more often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Lux is 49.86%.
Senna
Người Cứu Chuộc
Ambessa wins against Senna 55.95% of the time which is 5.77% higher against Senna than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Ambessa wins against Senna 4.37% more often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Senna is 50.18%.
Neeko
Hóa Hình Sư Ham Học
Ambessa wins against Neeko 56.65% of the time which is 7.39% higher against Neeko than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Ambessa wins against Neeko 5.99% more often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Neeko is 49.26%.
Xerath
Pháp Sư Thăng Hoa
Ambessa wins against Xerath 57.23% of the time which is 7.76% higher against Xerath than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Ambessa wins against Xerath 6.36% more often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Xerath is 49.47%.
Shaco
Tên Hề Quỷ
Ambessa wins against Shaco 57.28% of the time which is 5.91% higher against Shaco than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Ambessa wins against Shaco 4.51% more often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Shaco is 51.37%.
Mel
Ảnh Chiếu Của Tâm Hồn
Ambessa wins against Mel 58.65% of the time which is 5.67% higher against Mel than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Ambessa wins against Mel 4.27% more often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Mel is 52.98%.
