support
This will vary because unlike other stat sites we include 100% of a brackets champions played and never include champions that don't belong in the bracket.
Diamond+ Champions Analysed: 3,643,056
We include 100% of the champions played of every selected tier bracket in our analysis, we never include champions from outside the tier quoted tier.
Fiddlesticks Counters
Fiddlesticks support vs support Counters
Fiddlesticks support on Patch 15.16 is the strongest counter to support champions of Rakan, Milio & Leona. While Fiddlesticks support is countered most by support champions of Alistar, Nami & Karma. Below is a detailed breakdown of Fiddlesticks support counters against support champions with a minimum of 100 games.
Alistar
มิโนทอร์เดือด
Fiddlesticks wins against Alistar 48.21% of the time which is 0.37% higher against Alistar than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Fiddlesticks wins against Alistar 3.94% less often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Alistar is 47.84%.
Nami
ผู้บัญชากระแสน้ำ
Fiddlesticks wins against Nami 48.37% of the time which is 1.56% higher against Nami than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Fiddlesticks wins against Nami 2.75% less often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Nami is 46.81%.
Karma
ผู้รู้แจ้ง
Fiddlesticks wins against Karma 49.66% of the time which is 1.58% higher against Karma than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Fiddlesticks wins against Karma 2.73% less often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Karma is 48.08%.
Lulu
แม่มดน้อยขี้เล่น
Fiddlesticks wins against Lulu 52.00% of the time which is 3.45% higher against Lulu than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Fiddlesticks wins against Lulu 0.86% less often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Lulu is 48.55%.
Bard
ผู้ดูแลพเนจร
Fiddlesticks wins against Bard 53.39% of the time which is 5.57% higher against Bard than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Fiddlesticks wins against Bard 1.26% more often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Bard is 47.82%.
Rell
หญิงเหล็กกล้า
Fiddlesticks wins against Rell 54.90% of the time which is 6.29% higher against Rell than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Fiddlesticks wins against Rell 1.98% more often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Rell is 48.61%.
Nautilus
ไททันแห่งห้วงลึก
Fiddlesticks wins against Nautilus 54.96% of the time which is 5.60% higher against Nautilus than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Fiddlesticks wins against Nautilus 1.29% more often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Nautilus is 49.36%.
Thresh
พัศดีโซ่ตรวน
Fiddlesticks wins against Thresh 56.05% of the time which is 9.11% higher against Thresh than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Fiddlesticks wins against Thresh 4.80% more often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Thresh is 46.94%.
Leona
สุริยันสาดแสง
Fiddlesticks wins against Leona 58.00% of the time which is 10.95% higher against Leona than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Fiddlesticks wins against Leona 6.64% more often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Leona is 47.05%.
Milio
ดวงไฟอันอ่อนโยน
Fiddlesticks wins against Milio 59.72% of the time which is 12.80% higher against Milio than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Fiddlesticks wins against Milio 8.49% more often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Milio is 46.92%.
Rakan
หนุ่มเจ้าเสน่ห์
Fiddlesticks wins against Rakan 60.78% of the time which is 11.76% higher against Rakan than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Fiddlesticks wins against Rakan 7.45% more often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Rakan is 49.02%.
