support
This will vary because unlike other stat sites we include 100% of a brackets champions played and never include champions that don't belong in the bracket.
Master Champions Analysed: 1,799,799
We include 100% of the champions played of every selected tier bracket in our analysis, we never include champions from outside the tier quoted tier.
Рената Гласк Counters
Рената Гласк support vs support Counters
Рената Гласк support on Patch 15.16 is the strongest counter to support champions of Треш, Рэйкан & Милио. While Рената Гласк support is countered most by support champions of Бард, Карма & Наутилус. Below is a detailed breakdown of Рената Гласк support counters against support champions with a minimum of 100 games.
Бард
Странствующий хранитель
Рената Гласк wins against Бард 44.44% of the time which is 3.52% lower against Бард than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Рената Гласк wins against Бард 7.99% less often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Бард is 47.96%.
Карма
Просвещенная
Рената Гласк wins against Карма 44.81% of the time which is 2.87% lower against Карма than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Рената Гласк wins against Карма 7.34% less often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Карма is 47.68%.
Наутилус
Титан глубин
Рената Гласк wins against Наутилус 49.03% of the time which is 0.18% higher against Наутилус than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Рената Гласк wins against Наутилус 4.29% less often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Наутилус is 48.85%.
Алистар
Минотавр
Рената Гласк wins against Алистар 49.07% of the time which is 1.77% higher against Алистар than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Рената Гласк wins against Алистар 2.70% less often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Алистар is 47.30%.
Нами
Повелительница морей
Рената Гласк wins against Нами 50.00% of the time which is 3.50% higher against Нами than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Рената Гласк wins against Нами 0.97% less often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Нами is 46.50%.
Релл
Железная дева
Рената Гласк wins against Релл 52.85% of the time which is 4.70% higher against Релл than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Рената Гласк wins against Релл 0.23% more often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Релл is 48.15%.
Лулу
Волшебница фей
Рената Гласк wins against Лулу 53.36% of the time which is 5.21% higher against Лулу than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Рената Гласк wins against Лулу 0.74% more often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Лулу is 48.15%.
Леона
Ослепительный рассвет
Рената Гласк wins against Леона 53.70% of the time which is 6.81% higher against Леона than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Рената Гласк wins against Леона 2.34% more often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Леона is 46.89%.
Милио
Ласковое пламя
Рената Гласк wins against Милио 56.38% of the time which is 10.65% higher against Милио than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Рената Гласк wins against Милио 6.19% more often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Милио is 45.73%.
Рэйкан
Обольститель
Рената Гласк wins against Рэйкан 57.69% of the time which is 9.54% higher against Рэйкан than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Рената Гласк wins against Рэйкан 5.07% more often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Рэйкан is 48.15%.
Треш
Страж цепей
Рената Гласк wins against Треш 58.52% of the time which is 11.94% higher against Треш than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Рената Гласк wins against Треш 7.47% more often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Треш is 46.58%.
