top
This will vary because unlike other stat sites we include 100% of a brackets champions played and never include champions that don't belong in the bracket.
Emerald+ Champions Analysed: 15,644,546
We include 100% of the champions played of every selected tier bracket in our analysis, we never include champions from outside the tier quoted tier.
Наутилус Counters
Наутилус top vs support Counters
Presently there is insufficent games played by Наутилус top on Patch 15.16 to determine the strongest support counters. A matchup requires a minimum of 100 games to be displayed.
Нами
Повелительница морей
Наутилус wins against Нами 40.43% of the time which is 6.29% lower against Нами than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Наутилус wins against Нами 5.29% less often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Нами is 46.72%.
Треш
Страж цепей
Наутилус wins against Треш 48.73% of the time which is 1.19% higher against Треш than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Наутилус wins against Треш 2.20% more often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Треш is 47.54%.
Карма
Просвещенная
Наутилус wins against Карма 50.00% of the time which is 1.67% higher against Карма than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Наутилус wins against Карма 2.68% more often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Карма is 48.33%.
Милио
Ласковое пламя
Наутилус wins against Милио 50.69% of the time which is 4.28% higher against Милио than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Наутилус wins against Милио 5.28% more often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Милио is 46.41%.
Лулу
Волшебница фей
Наутилус wins against Лулу 51.15% of the time which is 2.50% higher against Лулу than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Наутилус wins against Лулу 3.51% more often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Лулу is 48.65%.
