jungle
This will vary because unlike other stat sites we include 100% of a brackets champions played and never include champions that don't belong in the bracket.
Unranked Champions Analysed: 490,239
We include 100% of the champions played of every selected tier bracket in our analysis, we never include champions from outside the tier quoted tier.
Гекарим Counters
Гекарим jungle vs support Counters
Presently there is insufficent games played by Гекарим jungle on Patch 15.9 to determine the strongest support counters. A matchup requires a minimum of 100 games to be displayed.
Люкс
Леди сияния
Гекарим wins against Люкс 47.69% of the time which is 9.33% lower against Люкс than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Гекарим wins against Люкс 13.72% less often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Люкс is 57.02%.
Лулу
Волшебница фей
Гекарим wins against Лулу 49.12% of the time which is 0.51% higher against Лулу than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Гекарим wins against Лулу 4.09% less often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Лулу is 48.61%.
Наутилус
Титан глубин
Гекарим wins against Наутилус 51.92% of the time which is 1.35% lower against Наутилус than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Гекарим wins against Наутилус 5.88% less often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Наутилус is 53.27%.
Треш
Страж цепей
Гекарим wins against Треш 58.40% of the time which is 6.05% higher against Треш than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Гекарим wins against Треш 1.50% more often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Треш is 52.35%.
Нами
Повелительница морей
Гекарим wins against Нами 59.81% of the time which is 11.06% higher against Нами than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Гекарим wins against Нами 6.46% more often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Нами is 48.75%.
