top
This will vary because unlike other stat sites we include 100% of a brackets champions played and never include champions that don't belong in the bracket.
Master+ Champions Analysed: 809,356
We include 100% of the champions played of every selected tier bracket in our analysis, we never include champions from outside the tier quoted tier.
Gangplank Counters
Gangplank top vs bottom Counters
Gangplank top on Patch 7 is the strongest counter to bottom champions of Varus, Ezreal & Ashe. While Gangplank top is countered most by bottom champions of Caitlyn, Kai'Sa & Jinx. Below is a detailed breakdown of Gangplank top counters against bottom champions with a minimum of 100 games.
Caitlyn
a Xerife de Piltover
Gangplank wins against Caitlyn 48.00% of the time which is 1.04% lower against Caitlyn than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Gangplank wins against Caitlyn 7.00% less often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Caitlyn is 49.04%.
Kai'Sa
a Filha do Vazio
Gangplank wins against Kai'Sa 49.03% of the time which is 1.18% higher against Kai'Sa than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Gangplank wins against Kai'Sa 4.79% less often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Kai'Sa is 47.85%.
Jinx
o Gatilho Desenfreado
Gangplank wins against Jinx 49.70% of the time which is 3.90% higher against Jinx than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Gangplank wins against Jinx 2.06% less often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Jinx is 45.80%.
Tristana
a Artilheira Yordle
Gangplank wins against Tristana 52.11% of the time which is 5.74% higher against Tristana than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Gangplank wins against Tristana 0.22% less often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Tristana is 46.37%.
Aphelios
a Arma dos Devotos
Gangplank wins against Aphelios 53.57% of the time which is 5.14% higher against Aphelios than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Gangplank wins against Aphelios 0.83% less often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Aphelios is 48.43%.
Lucian
o Purificador
Gangplank wins against Lucian 54.02% of the time which is 7.14% higher against Lucian than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Gangplank wins against Lucian 1.18% more often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Lucian is 46.88%.
Miss Fortune
a Caçadora de Recompensas
Gangplank wins against Miss Fortune 54.84% of the time which is 7.51% higher against Miss Fortune than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Gangplank wins against Miss Fortune 1.55% more often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Miss Fortune is 47.33%.
Jhin
o Virtuoso
Gangplank wins against Jhin 56.35% of the time which is 7.33% higher against Jhin than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Gangplank wins against Jhin 1.37% more often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Jhin is 49.02%.
Ashe
a Arqueira do Gelo
Gangplank wins against Ashe 56.83% of the time which is 9.45% higher against Ashe than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Gangplank wins against Ashe 3.49% more often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Ashe is 47.38%.
Ezreal
o Explorador Pródigo
Gangplank wins against Ezreal 58.11% of the time which is 8.02% higher against Ezreal than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Gangplank wins against Ezreal 2.06% more often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Ezreal is 50.09%.
Varus
a Flecha da Vingança
Gangplank wins against Varus 58.55% of the time which is 10.31% higher against Varus than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Gangplank wins against Varus 4.34% more often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Varus is 48.24%.
