![Fiddlesticks](https://cdn5.lolalytics.com/champx46/fiddlesticks.webp)
![emerald_plus](https://cdn5.lolalytics.com/emblem40/emerald.webp)
EMERALD+
Patch
14.6
vs
Average Emerald+ Win Rate: 51.95%
Emerald+ Champions Analysed: 27,782,282
?
Different tier brackets will have different average win rates so we now provide the average.
This will vary because unlike other stat sites we include 100% of a brackets champions played and never include champions that don't belong in the bracket.
This will vary because unlike other stat sites we include 100% of a brackets champions played and never include champions that don't belong in the bracket.
Emerald+ Champions Analysed: 27,782,282
?
We are the only League of Legends stats site to analyse every champion from every ranked game.
We include 100% of the champions played of every selected tier bracket in our analysis, we never include champions from outside the tier quoted tier.
We include 100% of the champions played of every selected tier bracket in our analysis, we never include champions from outside the tier quoted tier.
![Fiddlesticks](https://cdn5.lolalytics.com/champ140/fiddlesticks.webp)
![bottom lane](https://cdn5.lolalytics.com/lane27/bottom.webp)
Fiddlesticks Counters
Fiddlesticks bottom vs middle Counters
Presently there is insufficent games played by Fiddlesticks bottom on Patch 14.6 to determine the strongest middle counters. A matchup requires a minimum of 100 games to be displayed.
Name
WR vs
All Champs WR
Δ1
Δ2
Games
There are no matchups meeting the 100 minimum game requirement for the current filters.