bottom
This will vary because unlike other stat sites we include 100% of a brackets champions played and never include champions that don't belong in the bracket.
Emerald+ Champions Analysed: 27,960,196
We include 100% of the champions played of every selected tier bracket in our analysis, we never include champions from outside the tier quoted tier.
Nautilus Counters
Nautilus bottom vs jungle Counters
Nautilus bottom on Patch 14.10 is the strongest counter to jungle champions of Shaco, Lee Sin & Nidalee. While Nautilus bottom is countered most by jungle champions of Xin Zhao, Viego & Graves. Below is a detailed breakdown of Nautilus bottom counters against jungle champions with a minimum of 100 games.
Xin Zhao
El Senescal de Demacia
Nautilus wins against Xin Zhao 44.17% of the time which is 2.77% lower against Xin Zhao than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Nautilus wins against Xin Zhao 5.09% less often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Xin Zhaois 46.94%.
Viego
el Rey Arruinado
Nautilus wins against Viego 46.84% of the time which is 1.91% lower against Viego than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Nautilus wins against Viego 4.23% less often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Viegois 48.75%.
Graves
El Forajido
Nautilus wins against Graves 47.46% of the time which is 2.33% lower against Graves than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Nautilus wins against Graves 4.65% less often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Gravesis 49.79%.
Kindred
Los Cazadores Eternos
Nautilus wins against Kindred 48.57% of the time which is 0.68% higher against Kindred than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Nautilus wins against Kindred 1.64% less often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Kindredis 47.89%.
Karthus
La Voz de la Muerte
Nautilus wins against Karthus 49.75% of the time which is 2.38% higher against Karthus than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Nautilus wins against Karthus 0.06% more often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Karthusis 47.37%.
Lillia
el Tímido Florecer
Nautilus wins against Lillia 50.74% of the time which is 3.12% higher against Lillia than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Nautilus wins against Lillia 0.80% more often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Lilliais 47.62%.
Taliyah
La Tejedora de Piedra
Nautilus wins against Taliyah 50.82% of the time which is 3.70% higher against Taliyah than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Nautilus wins against Taliyah 1.38% more often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Taliyahis 47.12%.
Kha'Zix
El Saqueador del Vacío
Nautilus wins against Kha'Zix 53.10% of the time which is 3.67% higher against Kha'Zix than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Nautilus wins against Kha'Zix 1.35% more often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Kha'Zixis 49.43%.
Nidalee
La Cazadora Bestial
Nautilus wins against Nidalee 53.19% of the time which is 5.16% higher against Nidalee than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Nautilus wins against Nidalee 2.84% more often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Nidaleeis 48.03%.
Lee Sin
El Monje Ciego
Nautilus wins against Lee Sin 55.53% of the time which is 4.45% higher against Lee Sin than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Nautilus wins against Lee Sin 2.13% more often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Lee Sinis 51.08%.
Shaco
El Bufón Siniestro
Nautilus wins against Shaco 59.43% of the time which is 11.83% higher against Shaco than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Nautilus wins against Shaco 9.51% more often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Shacois 47.60%.
