middle
This will vary because unlike other stat sites we include 100% of a brackets champions played and never include champions that don't belong in the bracket.
Emerald+ Champions Analysed: 16,422,577
We include 100% of the champions played of every selected tier bracket in our analysis, we never include champions from outside the tier quoted tier.
Σιντζντ Counters
Σιντζντ middle vs bottom Counters
Σιντζντ middle on Patch 15.10 is the strongest counter to bottom champions of Κέιτλιν, Τζιν & Έζρεαλ. While Σιντζντ middle is countered most by bottom champions of Σέννα, Τζινξ & Λούσιαν. Below is a detailed breakdown of Σιντζντ middle counters against bottom champions with a minimum of 100 games.
Σέννα
η Λύτρωση των Ψυχών
Σιντζντ wins against Σέννα 46.02% of the time which is 2.50% lower against Σέννα than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Σιντζντ wins against Σέννα 6.18% less often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Σέννα is 48.52%.
Τζινξ
η Ανεξέλεγκτη
Σιντζντ wins against Τζινξ 48.32% of the time which is 1.13% higher against Τζινξ than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Σιντζντ wins against Τζινξ 2.55% less often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Τζινξ is 47.19%.
Λούσιαν
ο Μαχητής του Φωτός
Σιντζντ wins against Λούσιαν 49.24% of the time which is 1.50% higher against Λούσιαν than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Σιντζντ wins against Λούσιαν 2.18% less often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Λούσιαν is 47.74%.
Τριστάνα
το Πυροβολικό των Γιόρντλ
Σιντζντ wins against Τριστάνα 49.54% of the time which is 1.82% higher against Τριστάνα than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Σιντζντ wins against Τριστάνα 1.86% less often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Τριστάνα is 47.72%.
Μις Φόρτσουν
η Κυνηγός Επικηρυγμένων
Σιντζντ wins against Μις Φόρτσουν 50.36% of the time which is 2.31% higher against Μις Φόρτσουν than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Σιντζντ wins against Μις Φόρτσουν 1.37% less often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Μις Φόρτσουν is 48.05%.
Σμόλντερ
ο Φλογερός Νεοσσός
Σιντζντ wins against Σμόλντερ 52.13% of the time which is 3.92% higher against Σμόλντερ than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Σιντζντ wins against Σμόλντερ 0.24% more often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Σμόλντερ is 48.21%.
Κάι'Σα
η Κόρη του Κενού
Σιντζντ wins against Κάι'Σα 52.38% of the time which is 2.55% higher against Κάι'Σα than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Σιντζντ wins against Κάι'Σα 1.13% less often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Κάι'Σα is 49.83%.
Βάρους
το Βέλος της Ανταπόδοσης
Σιντζντ wins against Βάρους 52.63% of the time which is 2.00% higher against Βάρους than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Σιντζντ wins against Βάρους 1.68% less often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Βάρους is 50.63%.
Έζρεαλ
ο Μάγος Εξερευνητής
Σιντζντ wins against Έζρεαλ 53.85% of the time which is 2.32% higher against Έζρεαλ than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Σιντζντ wins against Έζρεαλ 1.35% less often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Έζρεαλ is 51.53%.
Τζιν
ο Βιρτουόζος
Σιντζντ wins against Τζιν 54.08% of the time which is 4.80% higher against Τζιν than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Σιντζντ wins against Τζιν 1.12% more often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Τζιν is 49.28%.
Κέιτλιν
η Σερίφης του Πιλτόβερ
Σιντζντ wins against Κέιτλιν 56.20% of the time which is 6.63% higher against Κέιτλιν than the average opponent.
After normalising both champions win rates Σιντζντ wins against Κέιτλιν 2.95% more often than would be expected.
The average opponent winrate against Κέιτλιν is 49.57%.
